John Frame & God’s “Temporal Omnipresence” (Pt. 1)

II. I. There is but one only, living, and true God, who is infinite in being and perfection, a most pure spirit, invisible, without body, parts, or passions; immutable, immense, eternal, incomprehensible, almighty, most wise, most holy, most free, most absolute; working all things according to the counsel of his own immutable and most righteous … Continue reading John Frame & God’s “Temporal Omnipresence” (Pt. 1)

Stephen Charnock’s Response to Modal Collapse

As a result of the recent discussion concerning the doctrine of divine simplicity (DDS) an objection has been raised referred to as "modal collapse." This objection purposes to show an inconsistency in the claims of DDS when brought into relationship with divine freedom. For example, if God's will is indistinguishable from His essence, He could … Continue reading Stephen Charnock’s Response to Modal Collapse

The Necessary Relationality Argument

Register for our Newsletter! Get exclusive offers and receive news before anyone else! [mc4wp_form id="4137"] In our most recent debate with two atheists, Trey Jadlow and I ran what we titled┬áthe necessary relationality argument (NRA, pun very much intended). What is the NRA? The NRA is a rational evidence for manifold (multiple) relations in God. … Continue reading The Necessary Relationality Argument

Thinking About God: God Is Not Composed | The Baptist Reformation

Please don't forget to check out the video or podcast episodes based on this article. Also, make sure you read the prior article on divine incomprehensibility before moving forward! We have covered divine incomprehensibility and now we're off to divine simplicity! Sometimes the words we use in theology are not identical to how we use … Continue reading Thinking About God: God Is Not Composed | The Baptist Reformation